Discussioni template:PageQuality: differenze tra le versioni

Contenuto cancellato Contenuto aggiunto
m ooops!
Nessun oggetto della modifica
Riga 31:
::In the Page namespace formatting has a more radical meaning than in "online copypaste": you can check ''de visu'' if formatting can be considered right or wrong, complete or unacceptable. If a page is transcribed and well formatted is almost done, namely SAL 75%
::If there's a problem about SAL 25% applied to scanned pages it can be disambiguated [[Aiuto:SAL 25%|on the help page]]. What I feel important is a link to help pages and a plain description on them, that is what we are striving to do. I want to point out that iPork is stating policies decided through long discussions, whichs explains our need to adapt a "great but a little stranger system" to our policies. Let's go on and if there's any doubt, let's talk it over. - --'''[[Utente:OrbiliusMagister|<span style="color:orange;">&epsilon;</span><span style="color:blue;">&Delta;</span>]][[Discussioni utente:OrbiliusMagister|<span style="color:brown;">&omega;</span>]]''' 23:31, 23 giu 2008 (CEST) (CEST)
 
::I am sorry if you feel that things come without discussion. The ProofreadPage extension has never really been used on it.ws, and I hope that the reason is not people here having that feeling. As a developer, I listen to the advice of the people who use my software, not of those who do not use it. I suppose that you can understand why.
::For the moment, this extension is still new for you, and I guess that you need to acquire more experience with it. Once you become familiar with that system, I suppose that you will realize that it is useless to indicate that a page is empty: if a page is empty, it should simply be deleted.
::I hope that this extension will have some success on it.ws.
::[[User:ThomasV|ThomasV]] ([[User talk:ThomasV|disc.]]) 23:54, 23 giu 2008 (CEST)
Ritorna alla pagina "PageQuality".