Discussioni categoria:Testi in romancio: differenze tra le versioni
Contenuto cancellato Contenuto aggiunto
Riga 27:
::::::::::::Whether consolidating this content in one place like as a separate namespace on Wikipedia is best, or if there is another solution to make it organized and accessible to Romansh speakers, that is what I would like to see a discussion about with the inclusion of the Romansh-speaking users. --[[User:Terfili|Terfili]] ([[User talk:Terfili|disc.]]) 11:27, 30 lug 2017 (CEST)
:::::::::::::Quando si è cominciato a prospettare una collaborazione con l'Università di Bolzano/Bressanone sulle letterature retoromanze, per quello che riguarda il romancio la mia principale preoccupazione è stata due anni fa, quella di avere il supporto di una comunità wikisourciana per il lavoro impegnativo dei testi in djvu e infatti ''utente:Alex Brollo'' si è sobbarcato l'impegnativo compito di ''caricare'' l'immensa opera del Decurtins. Capisco, però anche l'esigenza di Terfili di rendere facilmente accessibili i testi senza disperderli tra tre ''posti''. Al [[Wikisource:Bar#discussione_sui_testi_in_romancio|bar di wikisource]] c'è una proposta proprio di Alex Brollo. Ma se non va bene, se ne trova un'altra: con un poco di buona volontà una soluzione al problema la si trova. La comunità dei wikisourciani ha detto che darà tutto il suo aiuto tecnico. [[User:Mizardellorsa|Mizar (ζ Ursae Maioris)]] ([[User talk:Mizardellorsa|disc.]]) 19:43, 30 lug 2017 (CEST)
::::::::::::: I understand your goal and I may agree about consolidation, but at the same time I am asking also to understand our own and our effort to save the Rhaeto-Romansh projects
::::::::::::: If your goal is to increase the participation of people in rm.wikipedia.org, the association Wikimedia CH would be very happy to help and to contact entities which can help, but having a more sustainable and efficient project than the proposal to aggregate content taken from
::::::::::::: About technical problems I would say that what you are speaking about is something that cannot be fixed with Phabricator. The integration of MLOL is done by an external entity and the same is valid for Kiwix. So when you are saying: "I think that is something that can be set up very easily by one of the people at the Phabricator" I will reply that these two technical questions have not involvement of the tech community and the pahcricator tickets cannot solve them.
::::::::::::: About the confusion of the phylological aspects I can understand, but the same concerns are not present when we speak with researchers of Rhaeto-Romansh (like the University of Bozen). They work mainly in phylological aspects and Wikisource is the best project to host this kind of projects. This will stress more my concern about your proposal to move in Wikipedia a project which has phylological goals.
::::::::::::: The question about Wiktionary is related to the new project of integration of the Wiktionary on Wikidata. This may open a lot of possibilities for the Rhaeto-Romansh when considering words like entries of Wikidata. In this case projects like Pledari will be obsolete and there will be the opportunity to work more looking at the wiktionary like a repository which is open to the reaserchars and can be integrated easily.--[[User:Ilario|Ilario]] ([[User talk:Ilario|disc.]]) 14:21, 2 ago 2017 (CEST)
▲::::::::::::If your goal is to increase the participation of people in rm.wikipedia.org, the association Wikimedia CH would be very happy to help and to contact entities which can help, but having a more sustainable and efficient project than the proposal to aggregate content taken from diferent projects.--[[User:Ilario|Ilario]] ([[User talk:Ilario|disc.]]) 14:21, 2 ago 2017 (CEST)
| |||