Contenuto cancellato Contenuto aggiunto
Aubrey (discussione | contributi)
Nessun oggetto della modifica
Aubrey (discussione | contributi)
Nessun oggetto della modifica
Riga 3:
{{Babelsource-X|admin}}
 
{{quotecitazione|Michael Hart, promotore del Project Gutenberg su Internet, ha detto una volta: "In una qualche data tra oggi e Star Trek, tutta quella roba finira' nel computer. Nessuno mette mai in discussione il fatto che tutti i libri scritti durante tutta la storia umana siano nel computer dell'Enterprise, ma nessuno si domanda mai come ci siano arrivati. Noi siamo quelli che ce li mettono dentro".|Note di "Trek Technology", da "HyperTrek" di Luigi Rosa}}
 
{{quotecitazione|C'è un tempo per leggere,<br /> e un tempo per costruire biblioteche|A.}}
 
{{Citazione|Jimmy Wales hoped when he started Wikipedia that the combination of enthusiastic volunteer writers with open source information technology would cause a revolution in human access to knowledge. The rate of growth of Wikipedia exceeded his wildest dreams. Within ten years it has become the biggest storehouse of information on the planet and the noisiest battleground of conflicting opinions. It illustrates Shannon’s law of reliable communication. Shannon’s law says that accurate transmission of information is possible in a communication system with a high level of noise. Even in the noisiest system, errors can be reliably corrected and accurate information transmitted, provided that the transmission is sufficiently redundant. That is, in a nutshell, how Wikipedia works.
 
The information flood has also brought enormous benefits to science. The public has a distorted view of science, because children are taught in school that science is a collection of firmly established truths. In fact, science is not a collection of truths. It is a continuing exploration of mysteries. Wherever we go exploring in the world around us, we find mysteries. Our planet is covered by continents and oceans whose origin we cannot explain. Our atmosphere is constantly stirred by poorly understood disturbances that we call weather and climate. The visible matter in the universe is outweighed by a much larger quantity of dark invisible matter that we do not understand at all. The origin of life is a total mystery, and so is the existence of human consciousness. We have no clear idea how the electrical discharges occurring in nerve cells in our brains are connected with our feelings and desires and actions.
 
Even physics, the most exact and most firmly established branch of science, is still full of mysteries. We do not know how much of Shannon’s theory of information will remain valid when quantum devices replace classical electric circuits as the carriers of information. Quantum devices may be made of single atoms or microscopic magnetic circuits. All that we know for sure is that they can theoretically do certain jobs that are beyond the reach of classical devices. Quantum computing is still an unexplored mystery on the frontier of information theory. Science is the sum total of a great multitude of mysteries. It is an unending argument between a great multitude of voices. It resembles Wikipedia much more than it resembles the Encyclopaedia Britannica.|Freeman Dyson, ''[http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/mar/10/how-we-know/?pagination=false How we know]''}}
 
{{quote|C'è un tempo per leggere,<br /> e un tempo per costruire biblioteche|A.}}
 
Aubrey, wikisourciano dal dicembre 2005, ''sysop/admin'' se a qualcuno serve saperlo.